Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab Reports

RUL Report #2.1. Taking Control of the Energy Crisis: Proposing a community-owned solar panel system in Beirut, Lebanon

Beirut, the capital of Lebanon is home to diverse communities and has a rich and lively culture. Spending the majority of my summers in Beirut since I was a child, has given me insights into the love people have for the city, but also the daily struggles of Beirut citizens since the 15-year civil war started in 1975. More recently, Lebanon has simultaneously been dealing with five crises which are
heavily centred around governmental mismanagement (Moore, 2023). These include the Syrian refugee, economic meltdown, and post-covid crises; as well as dealing with the aftermath of the August 2020 Beirut port explosion and the
continual effects of climate change. In fact, the World Bank (2021) listed Lebanon as one of the top 3 countries experiencing the most severe crises since the mid 1900s. These crises combined, specifically, the lack of effective governance and severe economic crisis have resulted in an almost complete loss of electricity in the city. I do not pretend to understand the full extent to which the communities
in Beirut have been affected by my short yearly stays in Lebanon, however, I will attempt to provide community-led alternative solutions to the energy crisis that move away from government involvement, the root cause of the current
conditions in Lebanon.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab RUL talks RUL week of events

Municipalism and the Commons (RUL week of events)

Ana Méndez de Andés (University of Sheffield)

Teams meeting link for livestream

Four years after the square occupations under the banner ‘Real Democracy Now’, citizen-based platforms presented to the Spanish local elections, and consolidated an institutional assault that won some of the most important cities – Madrid, Barcelona, Zaragoza or A Coruña – and dozens of smaller towns and villages. In their practice, Spanish municipalism appealed to the idea of thecommons to advance an institutional change towards radical democratic governance of collective resources. Thecommons were included in the name of some of the newly created local parties – such as Barcelona en Comú, meaning Barcelona in Common – and in public events, regulations and strategic plans, as well as in the rationale of the internal municipalist debates. This session presents a research on the effort to develop urban commoning processes in the so-called ‘cities of change’ and how the articulation of thecommons’ democratic ethos has shaped an alternative planning strategy situated in the middle of things: between social demands and state-driven programmes, political narrative and administrative normative, inside and outside public institutions. 

Ana Méndez de Andés is an architect and activist from Madrid (Spain). She was advisor to Madrid City Council as part of the municipalist platform Ahora Madrid and has coordinated the European Municipalist Network. Her research ‘Becoming-common of the public’ – documented in the Open Science Platform, under a Creative Commons license – holds an ESRC White Rose DTP award and has been supervised by Dr. Doina Petrescu (Sheffield School of Architecture) and Dr. Beth Perry (Urban Institute). She has co-authored the Urban Commons Handbook, the Municipalist Ecosystem and Urban Commoning in Europe maps, and co-edited the compilations Códigos Comunes Urbanos and Atlas del Cambio (in Spanish).

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab RUL talks RUL week of events

Housing as Commons (RUL week of events)

Experiences of the struggle for housing, ignited by the lack of social and affordable housing, have led to the establishing of shared and self-managed housing areas. In such a context, it becomes crucially important to re-think the need to define common urban worlds “from below”. Here, Penny Travlou and Stavros Stavridis trace contemporary practices of urban commoning through which people re-define housing economies. Connecting to a rich literature on the importance of commons and of practices of commoning for the creation of emancipated societies, the authors discuss whether housing struggles and co-habitation experiences may contribute in crucial ways to the development of a commoning culture. The authors explore a variety of urban contexts through global case studies from across the Global North and South, in search of concrete examples that illustrate the potentialities of urban commoning.

Dr Penny Travlou is Senior Lecturer in Cultural Geography and Theory at the Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of Edinburgh. Her research is interdisciplinary focusing on social justice, the commons, collaborative practices, emerging networks, feminist methodologies, critical landscape theory, epistemologies of the South and ethnography. 

She is also the Co-Director of the Feminist Autonomous Centre for Research in Athens, a non-profit independent research organisation that focuses on feminist and queer studies, participatory education and activism.

Categories
Latest from the Lab RUL talks

The Home Office’s ‘hotel maximisation’ policy (RUL week of events)

Dr Anna Pearce (University of St Andrews)

Teams meeting link for livestream

Tuesday Feb 5, 2-3pm, Arts Seminar Room 6

‘Smoke and Mirrors’ – Policy Incoherence as a Portal into the History and Politics of Asylum Accommodation Management in the UK

This presentation examines the Home Office’s recent ‘hotel maximisation’ policy, which aims to significantly increase the number of ‘bedspaces’ across the asylum accommodation estate by utilising MoD barracks sites and enforcing room sharing across the hotels currently being used. Whilst the expansion of hotels and HMOs to accommodate people seeking the asylum is a relatively new phenomenon, placing it within the historical trajectory of asylum accommodation in the UK reveals the carceral and value-extractive tendencies which have always been a feature of this provision. Using the policy’s moments of contradiction, opacity and incoherence as apertures to inquiry, a novel theoretical conception of the ‘asylum seeker’ as a double abstraction of both law and capital is presented. This composite category enables us to reach the heart of the Home Office’s current conundrum, in which policy objectives are arguably now driven by private sector motivations, with significant implications for the independence of the legislature from capital.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab RUL talks RUL week of events

For a liberatory politics of home (RUL week of events)

Professor Michele Lancione (University of Torino)

Teams meeting link for livestream

In For a Liberatory Politics of Home, Michele Lancione questions accepted understandings of home and homelessness to offer a radical proposition: homelessness cannot be solved without dismantling current understandings of home. Conventionally, home is framed as a place of security and belonging, while its loss defines what it means to be homeless. On the basis of this binary, a whole industry of policy interventions, knowledge production, and organizing fails to provide solutions to homelessness but perpetuates violent and precarious forms of inhabitation. Drawing on his research and activism around housing in Europe, Lancione attends to the interlocking crises of home and homelessness by recentering the political charge of precarious dwelling. It is there, if often in unannounced ways, that a profound struggle for a differential kind of homing signals multiple possibilities to transcend the violences of home/homelessness. In advancing a new approach to work with the politics of inhabitation, Lancione provides a critique of current practices and offers a transformative vision for a renewed, liberatory politics of home.

Michele Lancione is Professor of Economic and Political Geography at the Polytechnic University of Turin and coeditor of Grammars of the Urban Ground, also published by Duke University Press, and Global Urbanism: Knowledge, Power and the City.

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab

RUL week of events

Join us in a week-long series of events, book presentations and discussions organised by the Radical Urban Lab (RUL) at the School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews.

Our speakers present urgent, radical and cutting-edge research on questions of housing, commoning, everyday life, migration and public space – always through a social justice lens. The events are open to all – just show up, or follow a live stream of the events via the links below:

Monday Feb 5, 1-2pm, Arts Seminar Room 6

Professor Michele Lancione (University of Torino)

For a liberatory politics of home

Monday Feb 5, 2-3pm, Arts Seminar Room 6

Dr Anna Pearce (University of St Andrews)

The Home Office’s ‘hotel maximisation’ policy

Tuesday Feb 6, 1-3pm, School V, United College

Dr Penny Travlou (University of Edinburgh)

Housing as commons

Thursday Feb 8, 1-3pm, Lapworth Lab, Irvine Building

Ana Mendez de Andes (University of Sheffield)

Municipalism and the Commons

Friday Feb 9, 1-3pm, Lapworth Lab, Irvine Building

SD4116 Volume Editors (University of St Andrews)

Community-led solutions to urban sustainability challenges

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab RUL talks

Nick Gill in conversation @GOSSIP &RUL

November 24, 13:30-14:30, Hebdomadars room, St Andrews. Click here to join the meeting.

Professor Nick Gill, Exeter // Chair: Professor Nissa Finney, St Andrews // Discussant: Dr Vanessa Schofield, St Andrews

Inside Asylum Appeals: Access, Participation and Procedure
Appeals are a crucial part of Europe’s asylum system, but remain poorly understood. Building on insights and perspectives from legal geography and socio-legal studies, and drawing on hundreds of ethnographic observations of appeal hearings as well as research interviews, this presentation paints a detailed picture of the limitations of refugee protection available through asylum appeals. Although refugee law can appear dependable and reliable in policy documents and legal texts the discussion offers a unique insight into the reality that myriad social, political, psychological, linguistic, contextual and economic factors interfere with, and frequently confound, the protection that it promises during its concrete enactment. Combining evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy and the United Kingdom, the presentation therefore evokes a clear sense of the fragility of legal protection for people forced to migrate to Europe.

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab

Colin McFarlane in conversation @RUL

In September 2022, following Professor Colin McFarlane’s (Durham) outstanding lecture on “Fragments of a city”, we had the opportunity for a sit-down and conversation, below!

Categories
Latest from the Lab

Colin McFarlane lecture@RUL: Fragments of a city

In September 2022, we had the great pleasure of hosting Professor Colin McFarlane (Durham) who delivered an outstanding lecture on “Fragments of a city” – please see below for the lecture recording!

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab

CfP: The Discreet Charm of Prediction: Understandings of Digital Policing

The Discreet Charm of Prediction: Critical Understandings of the Digitalization of Policing

Over the past 20 years, police organizations and practices across the globe have adopted data-driven tools to predict and prevent crime (Ferguson, 2017; Brayne, 2021). In this conference, we will focus on the digital transformations within the police that have both inspired and engendered new sociotechnical imaginaries that either promise efficiency and security (Schafer, 2007) or stress the potential risks for mass surveillance and algorithmic bias (Egbert, 2019; Harcourt, 2007).

The discreet charm of prediction, in terms of increased efficiency, reduced fiscal burdens, improved accuracy of decision-making, streamlined data management, and lower crime rates, has thus been met with skepticism, significant critique, and even warnings of dystopia. The global rise of predictive policing methods is an example of the charm so far, yet its more recent fall is meanwhile indicative of the skepticism with which it has been met.

The overall goal of this conference is to better understand what law enforcement and predictive policing have become today, with the ongoing digital transformation and platformization of key functions of the police organization.

New concepts and the future of policing

A whole host of new concepts have arisen and needs discussion, such as smart policing (Coldren, Huntoon, & Medaris, 2013), intelligence-led policing (Ratcliffe, 2016), foresight or precision policing (Bratton & Anderson, 2018) – all of them to varying degrees seeking to reconceptualize the use of data analytics in the wake of societal critique of predictive policing elements. At the same time, there is a renewed interdisciplinary interest in improving the accuracy of said prediction by training data and introducing algorithms in experimental ways. To follow the future of policing, we need to understand where the trajectory of these concepts, imaginaries, and practices is now heading.

– During the conference, we will take stock of new digitalization strategies within the police and research that conceptually and empirically approach and problematize the diverse social consequences of the digitalization of policing.

– We invite multidisciplinary contributions that critically examine the move from analogue to digital policing systems, highlighting how the procurement and implementation of data-driven processes and big data impact legal, institutional, organizational, and public understandings, implementations, and executions of law enforcement.

Technopolitics within and beyond police authorities

Focusing on (predictive) software and big data also raises questions about the integration, use, and storage of data by the police. In other words, the conference also aspires to problematize the continuing platformization of police work (Egbert, 2019), i.e., software that structures, processes, and visualizes available data to facilitate criminological knowledge production. Said platforms spur controversies and raise not only societal, ethical, and legal challenges but also perform sociotechnical ontologies, such as shifts in policing practices as well as state-citizen relationships. In that manner, digital police platforms or similar software become gatekeepers to networked ecosystems (Plantin et al., 2019) involved in law enforcement and police practices raising issues of access to data, privacy, and transparency. This involvement occurs in novel ways that exceed previous models of public-private partnerships and thus creates new challenges for social justice, democracy, accountability, data ownership, agency, and, of course, law enforcement.

We are interested in how digital tools transform police work. Rather than understanding the police as a homogeneous institution, we aim to capture multiplicity and techno-politics within and beyond police authorities. Digital tools that bear potential for organizational changes and new managerial strategies (Gundhus et al., 2021) are under critical scrutiny. We propose to focus on the police not just as a law enforcement agency but as a giant administrative techno-political apparatus that has become increasingly digitalized. The conference also aims to critically investigate how power relations are reproduced, materialized, or disrupted by the affordances of predictive software within the police. This requires examining the underlying assumptions and values built into predictive police software and their impact on marginalized communities and individuals by drawing interpretive tools from interdisciplinary approaches that combine insights from the social sciences, humanities, data science, and critical theory.

The conference asks:

– To what degree and in what ways does digital software replace or shape police discretionary power?

– What challenges does the deployment of digital policing tools pose concerning their democratic governance and legal regulation?

– How does the digitalization and automation of police work change the state-civilian relationship?

– How do bias, power, security, and safety co-exist with algorithmic governance structures and predictive tools?

Combining well-known conference formats like paper presentations and roundtable debates with workshops and citizen involvement, the conference will articulate in the broadest possible sense what digitalization does to law enforcement – and vice versa.

Dates: January 29-30, 2024

Venue: IT University of Copenhagen, Rued Langaards Vej 7, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark

Type of conference: in person

Keynote speakers:

– Sarah Brayne, Associate Professor of Sociology at The University of Texas at Austin, US, and author of Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing.

– Simon Egbert, Postdoc researcher at Faculty of Sociology of Bielefeld University, Germany, and author of Criminal Futures: Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work.

Suggested (but not exhaustive) list of topics

– Meaning and manifestation of prediction in policing

– Law enforcement platformization

– Demoing and prototyping of police software

– Transparency of digital police infrastructures

– Lived experiences of digitalized police systems

– Bias management and auditing in digitalized police systems

– Fundamental rights in digitalized policing

– Privacy in data-driven policing

– Public-private partnerships in law enforcement

Types of presentations

• Researchers: Contributors may apply with proposals for either a single author or multiple-author presentations.

• Practitioners: Citizen rights networks, NGOs etc. may apply to present relevant findings or concerns from their practical engagements.

The conference language is English. All presentations should run for a maximum of 15’ and must be based on original research.

Host: The Critical Understanding of Predictive Policing project (CUPP) – https://cuppresearch.info/

The CUPP project critically engages with the implications of new technologies and advanced data analysis in relation to police work. We examine the social, cultural, and political dimensions of said work, and include the diverse perspectives of relevant stakeholders, within and much beyond the police force.

CUPP brings transparency to the critical investigation of innovative data-driven police practices: it opens the ‘black box’ of the digitalization of law enforcement and connects the dots in data-driven police work.

Submission process

The submission must include the following:

– Presentation title.

– Presentation type (paper or group).

– Full name, affiliation(s), email of corresponding presenter.

– Full name and affiliation(s) of all other presenters and authors.

– Research abstract (250-300 words) indicating: research objectives, methodology, findings, future scope, and 3-5 key words. For practitioners: the same submission as for researchers.

Deadline: Please submit your application no later than October 1, 2023, to Kostas Floros, [email protected]

The proposals will go through peer-review and decisions on acceptance will be sent out approx. six weeks after the application deadline. The submissions are evaluated based on their:

– Originality

– Scholarly quality

– Relevance to the conference themes and topics

Practical information

There is no conference fee. The conference includes refreshments during breaks, and it is possible to buy lunch on-site.

It is possible to attend the conference without presenting a paper. Deadline for registration of non-presenters: November 20, 2023.

Contact

Academic questions should be addressed to Vasilis Galis [email protected], Irēna Barkāne [email protected], and/or Helene Oppen Ingebrigtsen Gundhus [email protected]

Practical questions or questions regarding the application process should be addressed to Kostas Floros [email protected]

Organizing committee

Vasilis Galis, IT University of Copenhagen

Helene Oppen Ingebrigtsen Gundhus, University of Oslo

Irēna Barkāne, University of Latvia

Anu Masso, Tallinn University of Technology

Bjarke Friborg, PROSA

Björna Karlsson, IT University of Copenhagen

Giorgos Mattes, St Andrews University

Konstantinos Floros, IT University of Copenhagen