Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab Reports

RUL Report #3.3 The future of cycling in Kigali: Climate change and socio-economic factors

With climate change on the rise, ensuring sustainable cities has become increasingly important. The normalisation of cycling as an active form of mobility has been increasingly supported as a way to combat climate change. This research explores the role of cycling in Kigali, Rwanda, to extend the geographical scope of the academic literature to the Global South, which is currently lacking. The aim of this research was to explore the future development of cycling in the city, focusing primarily on weather and socio-economic factors. This was achieved through a survey of 82 cyclists in Kigali and interviews with 5 key actors. This dissertation finds that weather plays an important role in shaping cycling habits but is currently secondary to socio-economic status. In order to ensure the future development of cycling in the city and to avoid becoming a car-centric city, the City of Kigali needs to improve cycling infrastructure and change attitudes to ensure that cycling remains attractive and that Kigali achieves its Master Plan goals.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab Projects Protomagia

Art, politics and dissent in Plateia Protomagias: a documentary by the DtC collective (Sofia Makavou, Anna Papoutsi, Antonis Vradis)

Public space in Athens today is under attack: whether by way of rampant commercialisation, privatisation, policing or surveillance, the character of public space is undergoing a rapid, violent and unprecedented transformation. In the years since the pandemic, the city’s public spaces (parks, hills or squares) have been targeted by the authorities as targets to be pacified, and by developers as an area of potential profit. In addition, the city’s metro expansion (line 4) has commenced, meaning the long-term fencing off of some of the capital’s most emblematic and central squares (Exarcheia, Protomagias, Kolonaki, among others). Against this backdrop, authorities at all scales (municipal, prefecture, national) are exerting ever-more control over who has access to public space, and for what kind of use: event licensing, previously nearly-unheard of, is quickly becoming the norm; private enterprises are given scandalous ‘rights’ to trample over public thoroughfares, and ever-increasing policing targets already marginalised communities disproportionately. 

Migration and public space in Athens are deeply intertwined and reflect broader socio-political tensions and struggles over belonging, visibility, and rights. The city has long been a hub for migrants, especially from SWANA, and their presence in the city’s squares, streets, and parks is constantly reshaping urban life and space. Spaces such as Victoria Square, Exarcheia and Protomagias square have long functioned as sites of both solidarity and contestation, where migrants establish social networks, access support, and assert their right to the city. However, these spaces are also subject to policing, securitisation, and periodic invisibilisation and displacement, as state authorities and far-right groups seek to curtail migrant presence. Amidst austerity, rising xenophobia, and shifting migration policies, grassroots initiatives and solidarity movements continue to challenge exclusionary practices, transforming public spaces into arenas of resistance, care, and alternative forms of urban citizenship. 

The documentary explores public space in Athens today, how it is used everyday but also as a space for politics, dissent and art and by whom. We ask: is urban public space really public? Is it ever really free and open to all? Who has access, when, under what conditions and who controls access? What are the immediate and long-term implications? We take the example of Plateia Protomagias, one of the last remaining open spaces in the city. We consider it open in the sense that it has not entirely been ‘eaten up’ by Attiko Metro works. Surrounded by corrugated steel, it still is the last refuge everyday for many of the residents of the centre, and especially the overpopulated neighbourhoods of Kipseli, Patisia, Exarcheia, Gkizi and Poligono. It is also the space where many cultural and art events take place during the spring and summer months, as well as gigs and political discussions. Embarking from our own experience of co-organising a music festival with African street musicians in September 2024, we problematise the processes (internal and external) and discussions that we went through with regards to acquiring the Municipality’s permission to hold the festival there. We discuss between us and with other groups and individuals who made similar attempts, with or without permission, successful or not.

Decolonising the City (DtC) is a collective of researchers and film-makers that formed out of the namesake USF project, working on urban public space and migration, using visual and participatory methodologies.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab Reports

RUL Report #3.2. Conceptualising ‘creative resistance’ — Urban art, social cohesion, and political commentary

The contemporary city, though heterogeneous from context to context, is an enigma for the twenty-first-century geographer — cities serve as sites of socio-spatial exchange, as hubs of modernisation, and as agglomerates of people, all with differing visions of change and progress (Fuchs, 2012). Cities also act as meeting points between scales, as places of interaction between national, regional, and municipal decision-makers and their constituencies, which are themselves fraught with differences along cultural and demographic lines (Shatkin, 2007).


Therefore, it is within the city fabric and its constellation of stakeholders that inequality and conflict emerge, especially as cities become increasingly tethered to a global capitalist economy (Pinson and Journel, 2016). Understandably, the question that twenty-first-century researchers and policy-makers face is how to resist urban inequality. In the following work, I propose an alternative, and indeed more radical, form of resistance that hinges on the harnessing of creativity — especially artistic expression. In a growing body of scholarship that highlights this urban creative resistance, authors make a point of differentiating between ‘urban art,’ ‘street art,’ and ‘graffiti.’ in this report, I tend to use ‘urban art’ — a broader “umbrella term” that better encapsulates the various motives and media practised by artists, as well as their differing styles, narratives, histories, and geographies (Radosevic, 2013, p. 7). I also feel that ‘urban art’ avoids the murky and pejorative connotations of ‘graffiti,’ which is often synonymised with vandalism, lawlessness, and the dissolution of social order — all pre-conceptions that this work hopes to dispel.

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab Reports

RUL Report #3.1. An Analysis of Energy Politics in Lebanon and the Effect on Decentralised Community-Owned Energy Movements

24-hour electricity has not been accessible to Lebanese citizens since the end of the civil war in 1990 (Saghir et al., 2022). Lebanon’s energy crisis, rooted in political mismanagement and corruption has only worsened since the 2019 economic downturn, which as described by the World Bank, is one of the worst economic crises since the 1850s (World Bank, 2021). Lebanese citizens have taken the energy crisis into their own hands and supplement Electricité du Liban (EDL) or government-provided energy through diesel power generators and renewable energy. The citizens themselves have initiated a green energy transition, not for the desire to live more sustainably, but out of pure necessity. As a result, domestic solar energy production in Lebanon has increased tenfold over the last decade (Haytayan, 2023).

I think it is clear here that communities across Lebanon are more than capable of taking action regardless of the several political, social, and environmental crises happening around them. This understanding inspired my last piece of work on the energy crisis in Lebanon where I outlined a decentralised micro-grid community-owned solar panel system as my suggested solution (Machaca, 2024). Essentially, the paper looked at designing a solution an urban community could use to address a problem they were facing. This piece of work made a point of empowering the community without political involvement. However, political actors will always play an important role, whether that is a positive, or in this case a negative role. After finishing that paper, I was left eager to understand the past and present energy politics in Lebanon in order to analyse how political action will affect community-led initiatives like the one I had developed. Thus, this paper looks to summarise the past, present, and future of energy policy in Lebanon, to develop a more informed understanding of how this affects community-owned renewable energy systems.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab

RUL Sustainable Cities Art Competition

Welcome to the RUL Sustainable Cities Art Competition!

This competition is your opportunity to showcase your creativity and imagination while contributing to the conversation on building sustainable cities. We invite you to explore how cities can be greener, more inclusive, and connected through your artwork.

Themes and Guidelines

Competition Themes

We encourage you to explore the following themes through your artwork

Green Innovation: Explore eco-friendly solutions and green technologies in urban spaces.

Community Connection: Reimagine cities as inclusive, accessible, and vibrant places for all.

Accepted Forms of Art

We welcome submissions in the following formats:

● Visual Art: Paintings, drawings, or mixed media pieces.

● Photographs: Capture the beauty of sustainability in your city, or through collages.

● Digital Art: Use technology to create futuristic urban designs.

● 3D Projects: Submit sculptures or urban models (photographed for submission).

Winning Categories

1. Green Innovation Award ○ Awarded for the most inventive ideas incorporating green technology and eco-friendly solutions into urban spaces.

2. Community Connection Award ○ Celebrates artwork that emphasises social sustainability and reimagines cities as inclusive communities for all.

3. People’s Choice Award ○ Voted on by the community, this award recognizes the artwork that resonates most with the public.

How to Participate

1. Create Your Artwork: Use one of the accepted formats to explore the themes of sustainable cities.

2. Submit Your Work: Deadline is the 20th of January 2024

3. Engage in the Voting Process: For the People’s Choice Award, entries will be showcased for community voting.

Your art matters

The winning pieces will be featured as part of the RUL website. By participating, you’ll contribute to a vital conversation about urban sustainability and help shape the vision of sustainable cities.

Need some inspo?

No problem, check out @staradicalurbanlab on instagram to get your creativity flowing, Deadline is the 20th of January 2024 at 12:00

Please submit your work using this link:

https://forms.gle/XKZsZXFVqumoZrqu7

For any further questions please email [email protected], or contact us on instagram @staradicalurbanlab.

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab

Radical Urban Lab statement on departing X platform (formerly Twitter)

As a research lab committed to social justice, equity, and informed public discourse, Radical Urban Lab has decided to leave the X platform (formerly Twitter). This decision comes after careful consideration and stems from our deep concerns about the platform’s role in amplifying disinformation, hate speech, and perpetuating a toxic digital environment.

At Radical Urban Lab, we reject the notion that technology is neutral. We recognize that all major tech platforms are designed to serve the interests of data capitalism, prioritizing profit through surveillance, algorithmic manipulation, and the commodification of user data. When digital platforms are in private hands, the integrity of public discourse is inevitably compromised. However, recent changes on X have pushed the platform beyond a critical threshold.

The platform’s shift in content moderation, weakened verification systems, and its disregard for accountability have transformed it into a space hostile to inclusive and constructive dialogue. Recent restrictions on what data streams are available to watchdogs and researchers – especially through changes to its API – has not only diminished transparency but has also created a hostile environment for researchers, making it harder to track upticks in extremism and hate speech.

Compounding this issue is Elon Musk’s erratic and ideological behaviour, including the promotion of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, ‘the great replacement’ ideas, and white supremacy thinking. By pushing reactionary and far-right views to the mainstream, Musk has further contributed to the platform’s transformation into a space that normalizes neo-Nazi extremism.

In the name of ‘free speech’, neo-Nazi and fascist propagandists run rampant on the X platform, often boosted to the ‘For You’ tab or receiving ‘verified status’ which both legitimates and commodifies their violent ideological campaigns. X continues to profit through subscription fees from pro-Nazi accounts and by running advertisements on those accounts or adjacent to the pro-Nazi content. 

This supportive social media environment can give a sense of validation to hate speech and help far-right and neo-Nazi groups recruit more people. The spread of fake news and Islamophobic narratives in X during the violent anti-immigration riots in the UK in 2024 is an example of this strategy, which contributed to the escalation of violence towards ethnic minorities and migrants.

Furthermore, the introduction of the platform’s new AI tool, the chatbot Grok, deepens our concerns. Grok’s lack of transparency in data use, potential for bias, and ability to technologically amplify disinformation makes it a dangerous tool antagonistic to public reason. Grok risks becoming a weapon of Psychological Operations (PsyOp) warfare to manipulate public discourse, reinforce harmful ideologies, and distort facts.

We believe that any platform must be responsible for maintaining a balance between open dialogue and protecting the safety and dignity of its users. X has crossed this line, and we can no longer engage with a platform that perpetuates political bias and enables toxic, harmful and anti-social behaviour.

Radical Urban Lab will continue to push the boundaries of knowledge production on platforms and in spaces that prioritize accuracy, equity, and the collective well-being of all communities.

Categories
Latest from the Lab RUL talks

RUL and GOSSIP present: Prof Joe Painter (Durham), Rethinking Territory (again), Nov 13

The Radical Urban Lab is delighted to co-host (together with GOSSIP) Prof Joe Painter (Durham). November 13th, 1-2pm, George Cumming Room (and online).

Rethinking territory (again)

Since the turn of the century, the view of territory as the straightforward geographical foundation of political life has been challenged by new and more sophisticated thinking by political geographers and others. At the same time, global political changes and events seem to have reinforced the importance of territory. Terrorist attacks, warfare, migration, climate breakdown, trade conflicts, state-repression, demands for regional secession, nationalism and disease have all drawn increased attention to territory and are often credited with strengthening territorial divisions and ‘hardening’ territorial boundaries. Despite its sophistication, much of the recent geographical interest in territory and its apparent resurgence entails a set of binary distinctions between ‘territory’ or ‘territorial’ on the one hand and their various others or opposites on the other. Sometimes this is expressed in terms of a twenty-first century ‘territorial backlash’ against the notion of a ‘borderless world’ that was popularised in the 1990s. Territory and the territorial are similarly counter-posed to their purported binary opposites of globalisation, space of flows, networks, and relational space. The supposed re-emergence of territory as a fundamental ordering principle of political life is sometimes presented as vindicating theoretical and conceptual critiques of ‘relational’ and ‘networked’ ways of understanding the world. It is almost as if we are being invited to pick a side: do you believe in territories or networks? Are you a territorial or a relational thinker? Come along! You have to choose you know. You can’t be both! But what if we can be both? Indeed, what if we need to be both? What if we can only really understand territory – what it is, where it comes from, and how it works – if we see territory not as the antithesis of networks and relational space, but as something that is itself a relational phenomenon. Rethinking territory, I will argue, means considering how relations give rise to territory in the first place, sustain it, strengthen or weaken it, transform its effects, and shape its futures. This paper seeks to challenge the binary thinking that assumes there is a fundamental dichotomy between territorial phenomena (such the nation-state) and relational or networked phenomena (such as the internet). I question this separation and argue that territory should itself be understood in relational terms. In this view territory is a practical as much as a philosophical matter: territory is actively produced through human practices – and those practices both form and arise from networked socio-technical relations.

Categories
Featured Latest from the Lab

RUL proudly presents: Sustainable, Inclusive and Just Cities, Vol.2

The Radical Urban Lab is proud and delighted to present its second book! Sustainable, Inclusive and Just Cities Vol.2 is our collective volume numbering 431 pages, featuring 46 contributions from around the world on the questions of environmental justice, housing, infrastructure and social exclusion. Our expert authors (all students in the 2023/24 cohort of Building Sustainable, Inclusive and Justice Cities, SD4116), present a major sustainability challenge that a city of their choice is faced with, along with suggestions to the community on how to go about tackling this without relying on the support of the authorities.

The result is a stunning mosaic of stories of strife and hope, challenge and opportunity, threat and prosperity. Read the wonderful preface kindly prepared by Prof Deb Cowen of the University of Toronto below!

Preface
Deb Cowen, Professor of Geography, University of Toronto

We are living in defining times. Warnings of apocalypse surround us and fuel fear, rage, and denial – but also beautiful and courageous action. This a time of both profound urban crisis and radical urban repair. This means that what we do and how we know matters profoundly. The material stakes of urban knowledge and practice are hardly new, but as we hurdle through all the cautions from scientists, scholars, communities and social movements about collapsing ecologies, precarious economies, failing infrastructures and deepening divides, it becomes clear that we are at the edge of a precipice. Just and sustainable planetary and urban futures are more contingent than ever on how we apprehend and act at this precise and fraught conjuncture. This collection of exciting work offers deeply thoughtful and creative ways to meet these massive challenges, and thus makes a vital contribution to our collective urban futures.

As the collection demonstrates, cities and urban life both drive and diagnose so many things that are failing to sustain planetary ecologies and economies. Formal processes of urbanization produce untold toxicity and devour precious lands and waters, while they divide and dispossess populations, often failing to provision the bare necessities of life. Almost regardless of the specific topics or places we look to, we can observe these frightening trajectories. Mainstream approaches to urbanization today are not just implicated in processes of planetary change that threaten the very integrity of future life. Because of their anchors in unfettered and extractive growth and unfailing commitments to market models of value, they are often building an expressway to that precipice. This means that trenchant and rigorous critique must be central to any project of sustainability.

As cities and urban life continue to climb out of COVID-19 lockdowns and prepare for the next unknown but anticipated global pandemics, the challenges have accelerated. While people were locked down, capital moved perhaps faster than ever before. Even during ‘lockdowns’, circulation of all kinds required the labour of millions, and countless ‘essential workers’- warehouse workers, port workers, bus drivers, meat packers, nurses and cleaners – succumbed to premature death. In most of the world’s cities, wealth continues to concentrate massively and in fewer hands, as the urban landscape polarizes along the lines of income and race. Dispossession and displacement – long features of settler colonialism – have become trademarks of urban life. Displacement sparks mass movement at all scales – refugees flee economic, climate, and political crises – and they encounter sometimes insurmountable borders within cities in the form of checkpoints, but also borders of belonging and mobility that line nation states. Displacement within cities is often a feature of gentrification, but increasingly it is fueled specifically by its financialized forms. In some places this has meant the wholesale and high-tech remaking of urban landscapes – elite housing complexes complete with private social and physical infrastructures.

The abundance of global precariousness in labour markets elevates precarity to an epoch-defining concept. In response, urban security and surveillance have intensified in many places, now policing a perpetual crisis that has deep roots in old imperial forms. Elsewhere, imperial forms are actively being assembled and deployed. Urban warfare is a standard of our time, whether in Syria or Sudan, while ‘urbicide’ and its corollary, urban genocide, take shape in Gaza in real time for planetary, multi-media witness. So clear are the devastating impacts on Palestinian human life, but so too, the toxic bombardment of munitions, chemical weapons and fossil fuels exhaust local and wider ecologies.

And yet, all these troubling trajectories are being actively and productively challenged by communities and movements around world. Rather than a race to the bottom, we see people and communities making active decisions to change course. Indigenous feminist economist and community leader, Winona LaDuke, explains how Anishinaabe prophecies have long identified this conjuncture, when two distinct paths open before us. She describes how one path is well worn, making it easier to amble along. But the other path, while more challenging initially, can take us much farther and in better ways. The second path that she describes is a sustainable one, which promises to heal relations and ecologies.

We only need look to Glasgow or Toronto to see examples of cities that are working to address the afterlives of relations and infrastructures of urbanization that were first shaped by slavery and colonization. The courageous persistence of Black and Indigenous communities in their demands for redress and repair offer a precious path for us all to walk and help build.

We can look to the projects of urban farming and alternative food economies as example of efforts in many cities, not only to address the immediate question of affordable and nutritious food supply, or to repair local ecologies, but also to generate alternative economies and infrastructures otherwise. In this way, people are working to heal urban landscapes and social worlds and reassemble them in a just and sustainable manner.

In the realm of employment and work, we see growth of cooperative enterprises that at once refuse the tenets of a cutthroat global competitiveness while re-investing in the possibility for democratic economic relations. Simultaneously reconfiguring economies, infrastructures and wider social and ecological relations, co-operative initiatives are offering inspiration that cross sectors. In the field of housing, cooperatives have long provided an inspiring alternative and addition to market or public forms. Co-ops are also accompanied increasingly by community land trusts, which likewise emphasize collective and collaborative governance of urban land and infrastructure. Land trusts sometimes start small, but they can have significant impact on much wider relations by virtue of how they work to bring land into community ownership and care.

We can likewise highlight the rejuvenation of the labour movement, and perhaps most notably in the very sectors that have engineered its global urban decline. Efforts are underway by precarious workers to assert their voice and power in the urban economies that constitute global supply chains. As prime example, we can look to the work of New York’s Amazon Labour Union and their multiracial and gender diverse leadership, who model a form of aspirational politics for precarious young workers of the world.

Of course, infrastructures of circulation and security are being challenged and remade in cities around the world. The proliferation of transit riders’ unions, who demand a seat at the planning table point to a sea change in top-down modernist planning practices. While certainly not brand new, these movements for infrastructural change often emphasize demands for a different process as well as outcome in their claims to city building. Alongside these vital efforts to encourage ecologically and socially enhanced mobility, urban citizens are also fighting carceral forms that erect barriers to movement and sometimes violently contain communities. These are thankfully too numerous to name in all their creative form, but we can simultaneously acknowledge movements for migrant justice, for Black lives, and for a generative politics of ‘abolition’ anchored in efforts to rebuild our social infrastructures.

I write these reflections from New York City, where multi-racial and multi-faith student movements are once again leading the way, courageously rejuvenating faith in the promise of just futures. Columbia students have made powerful stands for global and local justice anchored in their solidarity with Palestinians. But as they confront the crisis in the Middle East, they also come into conflict with campus administrators, and New York police, once again reminding us that the promising change that is underway at the critical conjuncture is often scaled in multiple, intentional and planetary ways.

These reflections highlight some of the beautiful lessons of this book, which brilliantly traces transnational urban geographies and circulation of transformative practice, as much as it also marks the multiple articulations of crises. People are working hard and collaboratively to assemble alternative futures in response to every single challenge named above and the authors guide us expertly in exploring otherwise
urbanism. I am deeply grateful to the authors for their powerful efforts.

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab Reports

RUL Report #2.1. Taking Control of the Energy Crisis: Proposing a community-owned solar panel system in Beirut, Lebanon

Beirut, the capital of Lebanon is home to diverse communities and has a rich and lively culture. Spending the majority of my summers in Beirut since I was a child, has given me insights into the love people have for the city, but also the daily struggles of Beirut citizens since the 15-year civil war started in 1975. More recently, Lebanon has simultaneously been dealing with five crises which are heavily centred around governmental mismanagement (Moore, 2023). These include the Syrian refugee, economic meltdown, and post-covid crises; as well as dealing with the aftermath of the August 2020 Beirut port explosion and the continual effects of climate change. In fact, the World Bank (2021) listed Lebanon as one of the top 3 countries experiencing the most severe crises since the mid 1900s. These crises combined, specifically, the lack of effective governance and severe economic crisis have resulted in an almost complete loss of electricity in the city. I do not pretend to understand the full extent to which the communities in Beirut have been affected by my short yearly stays in Lebanon, however, I will attempt to provide community-led alternative solutions to the energy crisis that move away from government involvement, the root cause of the current conditions in Lebanon.

RUL_Report-3.1-Seema-Machaca-2Download

Categories
Blog Featured Latest from the Lab RUL talks RUL week of events

Municipalism and the Commons (RUL week of events)

Ana Méndez de Andés (University of Sheffield)

Teams meeting link for livestream

Four years after the square occupations under the banner ‘Real Democracy Now’, citizen-based platforms presented to the Spanish local elections, and consolidated an institutional assault that won some of the most important cities – Madrid, Barcelona, Zaragoza or A Coruña – and dozens of smaller towns and villages. In their practice, Spanish municipalism appealed to the idea of thecommons to advance an institutional change towards radical democratic governance of collective resources. Thecommons were included in the name of some of the newly created local parties – such as Barcelona en Comú, meaning Barcelona in Common – and in public events, regulations and strategic plans, as well as in the rationale of the internal municipalist debates. This session presents a research on the effort to develop urban commoning processes in the so-called ‘cities of change’ and how the articulation of thecommons’ democratic ethos has shaped an alternative planning strategy situated in the middle of things: between social demands and state-driven programmes, political narrative and administrative normative, inside and outside public institutions. 

Ana Méndez de Andés is an architect and activist from Madrid (Spain). She was advisor to Madrid City Council as part of the municipalist platform Ahora Madrid and has coordinated the European Municipalist Network. Her research ‘Becoming-common of the public’ – documented in the Open Science Platform, under a Creative Commons license – holds an ESRC White Rose DTP award and has been supervised by Dr. Doina Petrescu (Sheffield School of Architecture) and Dr. Beth Perry (Urban Institute). She has co-authored the Urban Commons Handbook, the Municipalist Ecosystem and Urban Commoning in Europe maps, and co-edited the compilations Códigos Comunes Urbanos and Atlas del Cambio (in Spanish).